Review



parameter 2d x ray system  (KUB Technologies Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol KUB Technologies Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol KUB Technologies Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    KUB Technologies Inc parameter 2d x ray system
    Parameter 2d X Ray System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pm41342396-51-8-7?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 5 article reviews
    parameter 2d x ray system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    KUB Technologies Inc parameter 2d x ray system
    Parameter 2d X Ray System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pm41342396-51-8-7?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    parameter 2d x ray system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    KUB Technologies Inc 4 parameter cabinet x ray system
    4 Parameter Cabinet X Ray System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pm41024441-51-61-60?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    4 parameter cabinet x ray system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    KUB Technologies Inc animal x ray machine
    Animal X Ray Machine, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pmc11958704-413-11-14?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    animal x ray machine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    KUB Technologies Inc dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa analyser
    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
    Dual Energy X Ray Absorptiometry Dexa Analyser, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pmc11830570-163-15-30?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa analyser - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    KUB Technologies Inc parameter 2d cabinet x ray system
    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
    Parameter 2d Cabinet X Ray System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pmc12153048-147-1-0?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    parameter 2d cabinet x ray system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    KUB Technologies Inc kubtec parameter x ray cabinet
    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
    Kubtec Parameter X Ray Cabinet, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pm39741387-128-10-10?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    kubtec parameter x ray cabinet - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    KUB Technologies Inc x ray
    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
    X Ray, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pm38781018-238-8-11?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    x ray - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    KUB Technologies Inc parameter cabinet x ray system
    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body <t>DEXA</t> analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.
    Parameter Cabinet X Ray System, supplied by KUB Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/parameter+2d+x+ray+system/pmc10879868-96-7-11?v=KUB+Technologies+Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    parameter cabinet x ray system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body DEXA analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    Article Title: Muscle‐specific gene editing improves molecular and phenotypic defects in a mouse model of myotonic dystrophy type 1

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70227

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Improvement of bone health and body composition parameters in MyoAAV–C3/384‐treated homozygous DMSXL mice. A group of DMSXL male and female homozygous mice at age P5 received a systemic injection of MyoAAV vectors carrying Cas9 and sgC3/384 pair ( n = 7), and underwent whole‐body DEXA analysis at 16 weeks of age. Control animals were wild‐types (WT, n = 16) and untreated DMSXL homozygous mice (NT, n = 14) of both sexes. All data are represented as mean ± SEM and individual data points; data from male (open symbols) and female (filled symbols) mice are pooled. (A–C) Bone health parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) (A), bone mineral content (BMC) (B) and bone area (C). (A) BMD: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.595, df = 14, * p = .02. (B) BMC: MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.371, df = 15, ** p = .004. (C) Bone area, WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 53, * p = .013; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 4.25, df = 16, *** p = .0006. (D–F) Body composition parameters: fat tissue percentage (D), lean tissue percentage (E) and fat/lean mass ratio (adiposity index, F). (D) Fat tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 46, ** p = .0052; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (E) Lean tissue %: WT vs. NT, Mann–Whitney test, U = 45, ** p = .0045; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.684, df = 17.14, * p = .015. (F) Adiposity index, WT vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 3.265, df = 15.37, ** p = .0051; MyoAAV–C3/384 vs. NT, unpaired t ‐test with Welch's correction, t = 2.643, df = 16.41, * p = .017.

    Article Snippet: Bone health and body composition were comprehensively evaluated at the age of 4 months using Dual Energy X‐ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) analyser (The PARAMETER™ XPERT® 40 Cabinet X‐ray System, T00261_A 9.2019; Kubtec Scientific, 111 Research Drive Stratford, CT 06615, USA).

    Techniques: Injection, Control, MANN-WHITNEY